Every week, AI models form new opinions about your brand. Some call you the leader. Some call you the alternative. Some have never heard of you. And it's changing faster than you think.
Visibility is binary. Memory is nuanced. We measure the nuance.
Do all 10 models agree on who you are? Or is your brand perception fractured across the AI landscape?
Memory isn't static. A competitor's blog post, a product launch, a news cycle—perception shifts weekly.
Context is everything. Being remembered as "the enterprise solution" vs "the budget option" changes everything.
When someone asks "what's the best power management IC?",
the AI doesn't search. It remembers.
You're in the answer. You get the click. You start the conversation from a position of trust.
You're the "alternative." The "also-ran." Or worse—you're not remembered at all.
GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral, and more. Each has different training data, different biases, different answers.
High consensus means you own the category. Low consensus means there's a gap between how you see yourself and how AI sees you.
Catch the moment a competitor starts gaining ground. See which models are shifting. Know before the gap becomes a canyon.
You might lead in 'enterprise CRM' but be invisible in 'sales automation.' Know exactly where you win and where you bleed.
See who you're fighting in each category. Know when someone's gaining. Identify the categories worth defending—and the ones worth attacking.
GPT, Claude, Gemini skew enterprise, Silicon Valley-centric training
DeepSeek, Qwen run on entirely different training data and priorities
Mistral and others with European regulatory and market focus
Same question, different models, different answers.
We show you where they agree, where they diverge, and what it means for you.
It's how you're remembered—and whether that's changing.